Broadcast Prism compares how the UK's main TV news channels cover the same stories. For each day it extracts the topics each channel covered, detects where one channel omitted a story that most others ran, and produces a cross-channel summary of each gap topic.

Methodology

How bulletins are captured, transcribed, and compared across channels.

  1. Topic extraction. Each channel's broadcast transcript is sent to an LLM with a versioned prompt that returns structured topics (name, category, relevance, estimated airtime).
  2. Deduplication. Newly extracted topic names are matched against the existing canonical topic list (LLM-assisted) so the same story is linked across channels and days rather than duplicated.
  3. Coverage gap detection (deterministic). A topic × channel presence matrix is built from the linked topics. A channel is flagged as having a gap for a topic only if it did not cover the topic, a majority of other channels did, and its total bulletin airtime for the day is not materially below the cross-channel median — i.e. it had spare capacity rather than simply a shorter bulletin. Severity is assigned from how many channels covered the topic and the spare-capacity margin. The gap decision is a fixed rule, not an LLM judgement.
  4. Neutral summary. For each gap topic, transcripts from all covering channels are passed to an LLM with a versioned prompt that produces a cross-channel summary with key claims and source attribution.

Channels

The seven channels currently captured, with their broad political spectrum and capture rule.

ChannelPolitical spectrumCapture rule
BBC ONE WestHD Centre-left / liberal bbc-one-news
BBC TWO HD Centre-left / analytical newsnight
Channel 4 HD Progressive channel-4-news
ITV1 HD Mainstream commercial itv-news
Sky News Centre-right sky-news
GB News Right / populist gb-news
5 HD Lighter commercial channel-5-news

Consensus is not objectivity

Why agreement between channels is a signal, not a guarantee of truth.

Broadcast Prism summaries are cross-channel consensus, not an objective account. Consensus can be uniformly wrong, or omit what only one channel covered. A story every channel agrees on is not thereby true; a story only one channel ran is not thereby false. Topics and coverage are derived from automated transcript analysis and may contain errors. Treat this site as a map of where attention went, not a verdict on what happened.